Follow us on social

Shutterstock_1381307081-scaled

Poll: China most influential power in Africa as US influence wanes

Responses suggest that Beijing’s investments are having a positive impact on perception.

Asia-Pacific

China is by far the most influential foreign power in Africa, according to a recent poll of African youth from the Ichikowitz Family Foundation. The survey also found that China’s influence is widely viewed as a good thing, with 76 percent of respondents saying Beijing has a positive effect on the region.

Perceptions of U.S. influence in Africa were lower at 67 percent — 10 points fewer than China and seven points fewer than Washington earned in 2020. And 72 percent of respondents said the United States has a positive influence in Africa, a steep drop from the previous score of 83 percent.

Alden Young, a Non-Resident Fellow at the Quincy Institute, blames Washington’s security-focused approach to Africa for its reduced influence in the region. “Right now, the U.S. is mainly seen as a provider of security equipment,” Young said. “It doesn’t have much to offer in terms of economic development.”

“The Chinese in particular are seen primarily to invest in infrastructure,” he continued. “It’s hard for the U.S. to take a leadership role if it’s not going to compete on a commercial, cultural, or financial economic playing field.”

Echoing Young, respondents with a positive view of China highlighted the country’s concrete impact on their lives, citing the importance of cheap Chinese goods as well as Beijing’s investment in infrastructure, job creation, and bilateral loans for African states.

The poll, known as the African Youth Survey, involved interviews with more than 4,500 people aged 18-24 across 15 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. This year’s survey is its second edition, while the first came out in 2020.

Besides the United States and China, respondents also cited the African Union (64 percent), the European Union (62 percent), and the United Kingdom (55 percent) as influential players on the continent. France saw the biggest drop in influence since 2020, going from 62 to 46 percent in just two years.

On an individual level, American leaders have a significant edge over any other international personalities. When asked who would have the biggest impact in Africa over the next five years, a plurality of respondents (37 percent) pointed to President Joe Biden, with American billionaires Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg taking second and third place. Chinese President Xi Jinping came in fourth with only 13 percent. Other leaders who earned some support included Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

Respondents predicted that Biden would have a much more positive impact than his predecessor Donald Trump, with 63 percent saying he would improve U.S.-Africa trade relations and 61 percent forecasting that he would help boost foreign investment.


(Shutterstock/ Oleg Elkov)
Asia-Pacific
Salva Kiir
Top image credit: Sudan's Sovereign Council Chief General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, is received by South Sudanese President Salva Kiir upon arriving at the Juba International Airport, in Juba, South Sudan September 16, 2024. REUTERS/Jok Solomun

South Sudan teetering on the edge of civil war

Africa

The people of South Sudan are once again forced to flee their homes and endure severe hunger as the country is on the brink of civil war. The escalating violence and skyrocketing tensions between leaders in South Sudan threaten the country's stability and regional security and risk worsening the humanitarian crisis.

President Salva Kiir’s recent detention of the country’s main opposition leader, Vice President Riek Machar, and his aides is raising fears of military clashes and violence across the country between the national force (SSPDF) and the military wing of Machar's party (SPLM/A-IO).

keep readingShow less
Fall of saigon vietnam
South Vietnamese refugees walk across a U.S. Navy vessel. Operation Frequent Wind, the final operation in Saigon, began April 29, 1975. (U.S. Marine Corps in Japan, official photo)

Trump can boycott, but the failure and end of Vietnam War is a fact

Asia-Pacific

The Trump administration has ordered U.S. diplomats in Vietnam not to attend ceremonies marking the 50th anniversary of the Vietnam War on Wednesday, according to a report in the New York Times.

Although mere ceremonies that look backward in history may seem unimportant compared to the current problems that diplomats must address, this decision to shun official representation at events that the Vietnamese government is organizing is regrettable. It represents a failure to recognize one of the greatest transitions in U.S. foreign policy from a destructive to a constructive path.

keep readingShow less
Pezeshkian Witkoff
Top photo credit: Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian ( Tasnim News Agency/Wikimedia) and US special envoy Steve Witkoff (Office of President of Russian Federation/Wikimedia)

Enrichment is the sticking point as US-Iran talks cautiously 'hopeful'

Middle East

Alarmed by reports of dissension in the White House on U.S. Iran policy, the director of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies recently warned that Iran will “exploit these different negotiating positions…as soon as the regime smells desperation.”

This alert was probably prompted by the White House’s chief negotiating envoy, Steven Witkoff, who stated on Monday, April 14, that “Iran does not need to enrich [uranium] past 3.67 percent,” only to declare on Tuesday that “Iran must…eliminate its nuclear enrichment and weaponization program.” In one day, he went from a position that could offer the basis for a negotiated deal to echoing administration hawks, such as national security adviser Mike Waltz, who insists that the total dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program is the only acceptable goal.

keep readingShow less

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.